2015-09-20 8:44 GMT+02:00 Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka at gmail.com>: > I propose to make the default value of stacklevel to be 2. > I think that unlikely this will break existing code. Consider this simple script: --- import warnings warnings.warn("here") --- Currrent output: --- x.py:3: UserWarning: here warnings.warn("here") --- => it shows the script name (x.py), the line number and the line, as expected. Now try stacklevel=2: --- import warnings warnings.warn("here", stacklevel=2) --- New output: --- sys:1: UserWarning: here --- "sys:1" is not really useful :-/ I would describe this as a regression, not an enhancement. It's hard to find a "good" default value. It's better to always specify stacklevel :-) Victor
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4