A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-September/141693.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP: Collecting information about git

[Python-Dev] PEP: Collecting information about gitTim Golden mail at timgolden.me.uk
Thu Sep 17 09:09:56 CEST 2015
On 17/09/2015 02:59, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 9/16/2015 5:20 AM, Oleg Broytman wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 07:44:28PM +0000, Augie Fackler
>> <raf at durin42.com> wrote:
> 
>>> There are a lot of reasons to prefer one tool over another. Common
>>> ones are
>>> familiarity, simplicity, and power.
>>
>>     Add here documentation, speed, availability of extensions and
>> 3rd-party tools, hosting options (both locally installable and web
>> services).
> 
> For me, the killer 3rd party tool in favor of hg is TortoiseHg, which I
> use on Windows. As far as I know (I did check a bit), there is no
> equivalent for git on Windows.  For me, the evaluation should be between
> hg+TortoiseHG versus git+???.

There certainly is (and with the obvious name!):

https://tortoisegit.org/

I use it every day

TJG
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4