On Sep 17 2015, "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen at xemacs.org> wrote:
> Nikolaus Rath writes:
>
> > Hmm, that's odd. As far as I know, the difference between the hg and git
> > DAG model can be summarized like this:
> >
> > * In git, leaves of the DAG must be assigned a name. If they don't have
> > a name, they will be garbage collected.
>
> You can turn off automatic garbage collection. I usually do: it's
> very unusual that I create millions of objects, or even megabytes
> worth of objects, that I'm creating.
Okay... (I don't quite see why this matters here).
> > If they have a name, they are called a branch.
>
> Tags are also refs, the difference being that committing child of the
> tip of the current branch advances the branch pointer, while that
> won't happen with a tag.
Yeah, it's like that both in hg and git, so I'm not quite sure what
you're trying to say...
Best,
-Nikolaus
--
GPG encrypted emails preferred. Key id: 0xD113FCAC3C4E599F
Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F
»Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4