RetroSearch Browse

Wed Sep 16 11:50:45 CEST 2015 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-September/141666.html

On 16 Sep 2015 18:48, "Paul Moore" <p.f.moore at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 16 September 2015 at 06:10, Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen at xemacs.org>
wrote:
> >   The only thing that hg really lost badly on
> > IMO was "named branches", and that's been fixed with bookmarks.
>
> FWIW, I still find bookmarks confusing to use compared to git
> branches. I don't know whether that's because bitbucket doesn't
> support them well,

It's BitBucket - their PR system for Mercurial primarily relies on named
branches rather than bookmarks. Gory details:
https://bitbucket.org/site/master/issues/6705/cant-create-pull-request-from-hg-bookmark

Regards,
Nick.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150916/347471f3/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-September/141666.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP: Collecting information about git