On Sep 16 2015, Chris Angelico <rosuav at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 5:44 AM, Augie Fackler <raf at durin42.com> wrote:
>>> but git is still better at it: ``git add -p``
>>> allows me to review and edit patches before commit while ``hg record``
>>> commits immediately.
>>
>> FWIW, I totally *get* wanting a staging area. That said, other than the
>> staging area, record (aka commit --interactive) and git add -p are identical
>> functionality-wise. We also now ship (at least as of 3.5) a curses UI for
>> record, which is quite nice.
>
> Looks like it's time I spun up my own hg, rather than using the 3.1.2
> that ships with Debian. A better UI for interactive (partial) commits
> would go a long way toward filling the hole left by not having a
> staging area;
You don't need to update Mercurial, it sufficient to install the
Tortoisehg frontend (unless you really want a curses interface,
Tortoisehg is X11). Give it a shot!
Best,
-Nikolaus
--
GPG encrypted emails preferred. Key id: 0xD113FCAC3C4E599F
Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F
»Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4