For one, because *I* have been a (moderate) advocate for switching to git and GitHub. On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net> wrote: > On 09/15/2015 08:02 PM, Oleg Broytman wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 09:46:55AM -0700, Benjamin Peterson < > benjamin at python.org> wrote: > >> This looks like good information, but why is it a PEP? If anything, the > >> devguide was probably be more appropriate. But even that's strange > >> considering we don't use git at the moment. > > > > Exactly because the core team doesn't use git the information doesn't > > belong to the current revision of Developer's Guide. > > And if it doesn't propose to make the core team use git, why is it a PEP? > > Georg > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org > -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150915/fd9837ed/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4