On Tue, Sep 15, 2015, at 11:02, Oleg Broytman wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 09:46:55AM -0700, Benjamin Peterson > <benjamin at python.org> wrote: > > This looks like good information, but why is it a PEP? If anything, the > > devguide was probably be more appropriate. But even that's strange > > considering we don't use git at the moment. > > Exactly because the core team doesn't use git the information doesn't > belong to the current revision of Developer's Guide. Unless it's actually going to argue that we should move to git, I don't see why it should be a PEP either.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4