On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 11:03 PM, Tim Peters <tim.peters at gmail.com> wrote: > > then what exactly would a value landing near the > > "fall back" transition have given for fold? fold=1 but EDT? > > As above, pytz is in its own world here. It doesn't need `fold` > because it has its own hack for disambiguating local times in a fold. But I consider it as an imperative that pytz's hack continues to work in the post-PEP 495 world. Fortunately, this is not a hard requirement to satisfy. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150911/1fef0cf9/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4