On 09/08/2015 10:20 AM, Alexander Belopolsky wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 2:37 AM, Mike Miller <python-ideas at mgmiller.net > <mailto:python-ideas at mgmiller.net>> wrote: > > To my knowledge there was i for interpolation, t for template, and e > for expression suggested. Any better ideas? > > > I believe someone suggested !"..." as well. I still think f"..." > notation is the best as long as these elements are called "format > strings" in the documentation. After all, we don't call a unicode > string "u-string" or bytes a "b-string". Given enough imagination > someone may find not-safe-for-work associations in those abbreviations > as well. Agreed. I discussed it with Guido offline, and we agreed on sticking with f"" to tie in with str.format(), format(), __format__(), and format strings. Eric.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4