RetroSearch Browse

Sun Sep 6 00:10:34 CEST 2015 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-September/141478.html

On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> If you really want to allow *any* Python inside a f-string, can you
>>> please at least explain in the PEP why you consider that it's a good
>>> thing?
>>>
>>
>> Sigh. We've gone over this on python-ideas. Your objection is not new.
>>
>
> I'm sure that later others will have exactly the same question than me.
> Is''t the purpose of the PEP to summarize a discussion to not have to
> repeat it again and again?
>
> Please, can anyone summerize the discussion (on allowing or not complex
> expressions in f-string) into a short paragraph in the PEP?
>
> I don't follow python-ideas and I don't want to subscribe.
>

But you can at least read the PEP. There is a whole section "Supporting
full Python expressions" which explains this.

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150905/823e3876/attachment-0001.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-September/141478.html below:

Literal String Interpolation is ready for pronouncement