> Actually, my current implementation doesn't use the lexer, although I
> suppose it could. I'm currently manually scanning the string, keeping
> track of strings and parens. To find the end of an expression, it looks
> for a '!', ':', or non-doubled '}', not inside of a string or (), [], or
> {}. There's a special case for '!=' so the bang isn't seen as ending the
> expression.
Ignore the part about non-doubled '}'. The actual description is:
To find the end of an expression, it looks for a '!', ':', or '}', not
inside of a string or (), [], or {}. There's a special case for '!=' so
the bang isn't seen as ending the expression.
Eric.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4