On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 6:45 PM, Eric V. Smith <eric at trueblade.com> wrote: > I've made a number of small changes to PEP 498. I don't think any of the > changes I've made in the last week are substantive. Mostly I've > clarified how it works and removing some limitations. The only > meaningful change is that expressions are now surrounded by parens > before they're evaluated. This allows for newlines inside of the > expressions to be ignored. > > I think it's now ready for Guido to pronounce on it. > And I'm ready to accept it. I'll wait until Tuesday night (Monday's a holiday in the US) in case anything unforeseen comes up, but this is really the Last Call for this PEP. > The code in issue 24965 is slightly out of date, in that it has some > limitations that are no longer mentioned in the PEP and doesn't enclose > the expression in parens before evaluation. If the PEP is accepted, I'll > fix that and update the issue. No worries. (The parens thing was something I suggested to Eric this afternoon. :-) I'll say a few words about PEPs 501 and 502, but I'll start separate threads. -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150904/26193fd6/attachment-0001.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4