On 27/10/2015 18:39, Sven R. Kunze wrote: > On 26.10.2015 20:54, Ethan Furman wrote: >> You misunderstand -- the order of string prefixes does *not* matter, >> so forcing us to use one is silly. > > I don't think so. > > It's better to have less possibilities in the beginning. So later on, we > can easily relax the restrictions without breaking compatibility. > > Best, > Sven Please no. Having a memory much like a bottomless sieve I have no intention of reading the manual every time I need to use string prefixes. Would the table listing "string prefix precedence" in The Fine Docs™ be unique in the programming world? -- My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language. Mark Lawrence
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4