On 10/23/2015 08:20 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 22 October 2015 at 19:12, Eric V. Smith wrote: >> On 10/22/2015 1:09 PM, Ryan Gonzalez wrote: >>> But it'd be weird now if fR worked but fbR didn't. >> >> Or bR (which is currently allowed) but not fbR in the future. > My own objection isn't to allowing "fR" or "fbR", it's to allowing the > uppercase "F". > > I also don't understand why we can't say "if 'f' is part of a string > prefix, it must be first". Sometimes order matters, and sometimes it does not. If the order does not have an impact on the final code, it does not matter, and making us have to remember an order that does not matter is a waste. -- ~Ethan~
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4