A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-October/142037.html below:

[Python-Dev] Should PEP 498 specify if rf'...' is valid?

[Python-Dev] Should PEP 498 specify if rf'...' is valid? [Python-Dev] Should PEP 498 specify if rf'...' is valid?Ethan Furman ethan at stoneleaf.us
Mon Oct 26 11:22:40 EDT 2015
On 10/23/2015 08:20 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 22 October 2015 at 19:12, Eric V. Smith wrote:
>> On 10/22/2015 1:09 PM, Ryan Gonzalez wrote:

>>> But it'd be weird now if fR worked but fbR didn't.
>>
>> Or bR (which is currently allowed) but not fbR in the future.

> My own objection isn't to allowing "fR" or "fbR", it's to allowing the
> uppercase "F".
>
> I also don't understand why we can't say "if 'f' is part of a string
> prefix, it must be first".

Sometimes order matters, and sometimes it does not.  If the order does 
not have an impact on the final code, it does not matter, and making us 
have to remember an order that does not matter is a waste.

--
~Ethan~
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4