Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-October/142006.html below:

[Python-Dev] Should PEP 498 specify if rf'...' is valid?

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 484 -- proposal to allow @overload in non-stub files
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Should PEP 498 specify if rf'...' is valid?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

It mentions fr'...' as a formatted raw string but doesn't say anything about rf'...'. Right now, in implementing PEP 498 support in Howl (https://github.com/howl-editor/howl/pull/118 and https://github.com/howl-editor/howl/commit/1e577da89efc1c1de780634b531f64346cf586d6#diff-851d9b84896270cc7e3bbea3014007a5R86), I assumed both were valid. Should the PEP be more specific?

BTW, at the rate language-python is going, GitHub will get syntax highlighting for f-strings in 2050. :D
-- 
Sent from my Nexus 5 with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20151021/3fc2c886/attachment.html>

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 484 -- proposal to allow @overload in non-stub files
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Should PEP 498 specify if rf'...' is valid?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4