Yes, randrange(n) does that. --Guido (mobile) On Oct 17, 2015 2:28 PM, "Brian Gladman" <brg at gladman.plus.com> wrote: > > Guido van Rossum wrote: > > > I'm fine with dropping the 3rd arg. But I find the argument to > > introduce a new spelling for 1-arg randrange() weak. > > I should stress that my preference for randbelow over randrange was > based purely on their proposed functionality and not on their names. > > I do however have a preference for a function of minimum required > functionality, i.e. one that allows only a single parameter (N) to > set the range 0 .. N-1. > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20151017/9b8198a5/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4