> Guido van Rossum wrote: > I'm fine with dropping the 3rd arg. But I find the argument to > introduce a new spelling for 1-arg randrange() weak. I should stress that my preference for randbelow over randrange was based purely on their proposed functionality and not on their names. I do however have a preference for a function of minimum required functionality, i.e. one that allows only a single parameter (N) to set the range 0 .. N-1.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4