On September 30, 2015 at 8:20:53 PM, Alexander Belopolsky (alexander.belopolsky at gmail.com) wrote: > It has been my understanding that some PEPs may be discussed on specialized > mailings lists, but a notice would be given on python-dev prior to any > acceptance. > I don’t see any requirement to post PEPs to python-dev if they have a Discussions-To header in PEP 1. I don’t really think it makes sense in this case either tbh, PyPI, pip, and setuptools are not under python-dev’s banner. We use PEPs because they are a convenient way to manage change (and we’ve even discussed recently not using PEPs for packaging things that don’t have anything to do with the standard library and moving to a more lightweight process more akin to the Rust RFC process for various reasons). ----------------- Donald Stufft PGP: 0x6E3CBCE93372DCFA // 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4