On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 09:19:37PM +0200, Serhiy Storchaka wrote: > If the support of UTF-16 and UTF-32 is planned, I'll take this to > attention during refactoring. But in many places besides the tokenizer > the ASCII compatible encoding of source files is expected. Perhaps another way of looking at this: Is it feasible to drop support for arbitrary encodings and just require UTF-8 (with or without a pseudo-BOM)? -- Steve
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4