On Sat, 30 May 2015 18:55:20 +1000 Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > On 30 May 2015 10:46, "Alexander Walters" <tritium-list at sdamon.com> wrote: > > > > Python is a giant cache-miss generator. A little performance boost on the opt-code dispatch isn't going to change that much. If we really do care about improving python to do less environmental damage, then that is a discussion we should be having on it's own merits. It was really out of place, even in this tangenty thread. > > I think the way core development gets funded is entirely on topic for > the main core development mailing list, we just historically haven't > discussed it openly, even though some of us have been advocating for > various improvements to arrangements behind the scenes. I personally > consider becoming more transparent about how we go about that process > to be a good thing. The way this so-called discussion is taking place feels much less like an actual discussion than an aggressive push for a change in maintenance policy. Guido has already taunted Ian Cordasco out of contributing. Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4