On 28/05/2015 15:47, Skip Montanaro wrote: > On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote: >> But you could argue that "Special cases aren't special enough to break the >> rules" and that's what we are proposing here by claiming Python 2.7 is a >> special case and thus we should accept a patch that is not a one-liner >> change to gain some performance in a bugfix release. > > One can read anything he wants into the Zen. I could respond with this > retort: "Although practicality beats purity," but I won't. :-) > > Skip > That's good, otherwise you'd just be repeating what Raymond said further up this subthread two hours and one minute before you didn't say it :) -- My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language. Mark Lawrence
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4