A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-May/140230.html below:

[Python-Dev] Issue 24285: regression for importing extensions in packages

[Python-Dev] Issue 24285: regression for importing extensions in packages [Python-Dev] Issue 24285: regression for importing extensions in packagesLarry Hastings larry at hastings.org
Thu May 28 07:35:24 CEST 2015
On 05/27/2015 08:02 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 28 May 2015 at 12:51, Ned Batchelder <ned at nedbatchelder.com> wrote:
>> This issue has been fixed, but a day or two late for 3.5b1.
> Aye, we only found out about the missing test case via feedback *on*
> the beta. We had never needed to worry about it before, but it turns
> out all our extension modules in the standard library are top level
> modules and we didn't previously have an explicit test for the
> submodule case :(

Well, certainly this sounds like something that needs to go into the 
regression test suite.  Can someone create the issue?

... and the patch?


//arry/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150527/0615dcff/attachment.html>
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4