On 23 May 2015 at 19:29, Tal Einat <taleinat at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 1:34 AM, Berker Peksağ <berker.peksag at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 12:53 AM, Chris Barker <chris.barker at noaa.gov> wrote: >> > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Larry Hastings <larry at hastings.org> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 05/22/2015 02:29 PM, Chris Barker wrote: >> >> >> >> Is it too late to get the isclose() code (PEP 485) into 3.5? >> > >> > ... >> >> >> >> Hopefully you can find a core dev familiar enough with the issues >> >> involved that they can (quickly!) guide it through the process of getting it >> >> checked in. >> > >> > Ping! Anyone willing to sponsor this? >> >> ... >> >> * The C implementation should be in Modules/mathmodule.c >> * Tests should be in Lib/test/test_math.py >> * Documentation should be in Doc/library/math.rst >> * Add an entry to Doc/whatsnew/3.5.rst >> * If I remember correctly, we don't need the Python implementation and its tests > > I'll happily review the patch once it's on the bug tracker as Berker described. I filed http://bugs.python.org/issue24270 to track this, but there's a fair bit of work to be done to integrate the changes into the existing math module's code, tests and documentation. And correct, there's no need for a pure Python implementation - Guido rejected the idea of a pure Python fallback for the math module a while back (http://bugs.python.org/issue23595) Regards, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4