RetroSearch Browse

Wed May 6 11:20:50 CEST 2015 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-May/139860.html

On 5 May 2015 at 17:48, Yury Selivanov <yselivanov.ml at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I've updated the PEP with some fixes of the terminology:
> https://hg.python.org/peps/rev/f156b272f860

Yes that looks better.

> I still think that 'coroutine functions' and 'coroutines'
> is a better pair than 'async functions' and 'coroutines'.

Fair enough. The terminology in the PEP seems consistent now which is
more important than the exact terms used.

--
Oscar

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-May/139860.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 492: What is the real goal?