RetroSearch Browse

Tue May 5 23:31:56 CEST 2015 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-May/139830.html

On 5 May 2015 at 22:09, Jim J. Jewett <jimjjewett at gmail.com> wrote:
> Proposed second paragraph of the abstract:
>
> This PEP assumes that the asynchronous tasks are scheduled and
> coordinated by an Event Loop similar to that of stdlib module
> asyncio.events.AbstractEventLoop.  While the PEP is not tied to
> any specific Event Loop implementation, it is relevant only to
> the kind of coroutine that uses "yield" as a signal to the scheduler,
> indicating that the coroutine will be waiting until an event (such
> as IO) is completed.

+1. If that's not accurate then by all means correct any mistakes in
it. But assuming it *is* accurate, it would help a lot.
Paul

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-May/139830.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 492: Please mention the Event Loop