Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-May/139775.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 492: async/await in Python; version 4

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 492: async/await in Python; version 4
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] ABCs - Re: PEP 492: async/await in Python; version 4
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Yury Selivanov schrieb am 01.05.2015 um 20:52:
> I don't like the idea of combining __next__ and __anext__.

Ok, fair enough. So, how would you use this new protocol manually then?
Say, I already know that I won't need to await the next item that the
iterator will return. For normal iterators, I could just call next() on it
and continue the for-loop. How would I do it for AIterators?

Stefan

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 492: async/await in Python; version 4
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] ABCs - Re: PEP 492: async/await in Python; version 4
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4