RetroSearch Browse

Fri May 1 22:27:35 CEST 2015 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-May/139768.html

On 2015-05-01 4:24 PM, Arnaud Delobelle wrote:
> On 1 May 2015 at 20:24, Yury Selivanov <yselivanov.ml at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 2015-05-01 3:19 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
> [...]
>>> If we must have __aiter__, then we may as well also have __anext__;
>>> besides
>>> being more consistent, it also allows an object to be both a normol
>>> iterator
>>> and an asynch iterator.
>>
>> And this is a good point too.
> I'm not convinced that allowing an object to be both a normal and an
> async iterator is a good thing.  It could be a recipe for confusion.
>

I doubt that it will be a popular thing.  But disallowing this
by merging two different protocols in one isn't a good idea
either.

Yury

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-May/139768.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 492: async/await in Python; version 4