Nathaniel Smith wrote: > If await acted like -, then this would be > await (x ** 2) > But with the proposed grammar, it's instead > (await x) ** 2 Ah, I had missed that! This is a *good* argument for Yuri's grammar. I withdraw my objection now. -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4