On Fri, Mar 20, 2015, at 19:16, Neil Girdhar wrote: > Wow, this is an excellent review. Thank you. > > My only question is with respect to this: > > I think there ought to be two opcodes; one for unpacking maps in > function calls and another for literals. The whole function location > thing is rather hideous. > > What are the two opcodes? BUILD_MAP_UNPACK and > BUILD_MAP_UNPACK_WITH_CALL? > > The first takes (n) a number of maps that it will merge, and the second > does the same but also accepts (function_call_location) for the purpose > of > error reporting? Exactly.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4