On Mar 18, 2015, at 02:44 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: >Interesting, I've cautiously in favor of -s in Fedora but the more I've >thought about it the less I've liked -E. It just seems like PYTHONPATH is >analagous to LD_LIBRARY_PATH for C programs and PATH for shell scripting. >We leave both of those for local admins and users to affect the behaviour of >programs if they needed to. It is, and it isn't. It's different because you can always explicitly override the shebang line if needed. So if a local admin really needed to override $PYTHONPATH (though I can't come up with a use case right now), they could just: $ python3 -s /usr/bin/foo >Was there some discussion of -E specifically in Debian where it was >consciously decided that PYTHONPATH was not analagous or that the benefit >risk was different than for those other env vars? I'd have to go digging around the archives. It wasn't a recent discussion IIRC. Cheers, -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150318/678ef8a2/attachment.sig>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4