RetroSearch Browse

Thu Mar 12 15:46:34 CET 2015 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-March/138765.html

On 3/12/2015 10:00 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 12:37:16 +0000
> "Loevborg, Soeren Jakob" <soeren.j.loevborg at siemens.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>> import ipaddress
>>>>> ipaddress.IPv4Interface('10.0.0.1/8') + 1
>> IPv4Interface('10.0.0.2/32')
>>>>> ipaddress.IPv6Interface('fd00::1/64') + 1
>> IPv6Interface('fd00::2/128')
> 
> Given that the behaviour is unlikely to match any use case, I'd say
> it's a bug.

Agreed.

> Related issue:
> 
>>>> ipaddress.IPv4Interface('10.0.0.255/8') + 1
> IPv4Interface('10.0.1.0/32')
> 
> Should the result be IPv4Interface('10.0.0.0/8')
> (i.e. wrap around)? Should OverflowError be raised?

I think it should be an OverflowError. 10.0.1.0/8 makes no sense, and
10.0.0.0/8 is unlikely to be desirable.

-- 
Eric.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-March/138765.html below:

[Python-Dev] Request for comments: [issue22941] IPv4Interface arithmetic changes subnet mask