On 11 March 2015 at 21:45, Maciej Fijalkowski <fijall at gmail.com> wrote: >> Is it possible to use cffi without a C compiler/headers as easily than >> ctypes? > > yes, it has two modes, one that does that and the other that does > extra safety at the cost of a C compiler So if someone were to propose a practical approach to including cffi into the stdlib, *and* assisting the many Windows projects using ctypes for access to the Windows API [1], then there may be a reasonable argument for deprecating ctypes. But nobody seems to be doing that, rather the suggestion appears to be just to deprecate a widely used part of the stdlib offering no migration path :-( Paul [1] There may be Unix users of ctypes, but AFAIK, the vast majority of use cases are on Windows.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4