On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 6:49 PM Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org> wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2015, at 15:11, Brett Cannon wrote: > > > > OK, but that doesn't influence the PEP's goal of dropping .pyo files. > > Correct. > > > > > Are you suggesting that the tag be changed to be less specific to > > optimizations and more free-form? Like > > `importlib.cpython-35.__no-asserts_no-docstrings__.pyc`? Otherwise stuff > > like this gets baked into the .pyc file itself instead of the file name, > > but I don't think we should just drop the ability to switch off asserts > > and > > docstrings like Mark seemed to be suggesting. > > Basically, though the filename strings could perhaps be more compact. > I have a poll going on G+ to see what people think of the various proposed file name formats at https://plus.google.com/u/0/+BrettCannon/posts/fZynLNwHWGm . Feel free to vote if you have an opinion. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150311/fc12cda5/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4