RetroSearch Browse

Sat Mar 7 01:04:52 CET 2015 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-March/138646.html

On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 6:49 PM Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org>
wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015, at 15:11, Brett Cannon wrote:
> >
> > OK, but that doesn't influence the PEP's goal of dropping .pyo files.
>
> Correct.
>
> >
> > Are you suggesting that the tag be changed to be less specific to
> > optimizations and more free-form? Like
> > `importlib.cpython-35.__no-asserts_no-docstrings__.pyc`? Otherwise stuff
> > like this gets baked into the .pyc file itself instead of the file name,
> > but I don't think we should just drop the ability to switch off asserts
> > and
> > docstrings like Mark seemed to be suggesting.
>
> Basically, though the filename strings could perhaps be more compact.
>

That's fine. Do you have a file name format you want to propose then
instead of "opt-{}" (which is what I'm assuming your "basically" is
referring to)?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150307/0707cd34/attachment-0001.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-March/138646.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 488: elimination of PYO files