On 06/03/15 16:34, Brett Cannon wrote: > Over on the import-sig I proposed eliminating the concept of .pyo files > since they only signify that /some/ optimization took place, not > /what/ optimizations took place. Everyone on the SIG was positive with > the idea so I wrote a PEP, got positive feedback from the SIG again, and > so now I present to you PEP 488 for discussion. > [snip] Historically -O and -OO have been the antithesis of optimisation, they change the behaviour of the program with no noticeable effect on performance. If a change is to be made, why not just drop .pyo files and be done with it? Any worthwhile optimisation needs to be done at runtime or involve much more than tweaking bytecode. Cheers, Mark.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4