Per Nick's advice I've created enhancement proposal 245340 with an attached patch. On 14 June 2015 at 19:16, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: > A good plan. I think this could be added to 3.5 still? It's a pretty minor > adjustment to the PEP 492 machinery, really. > > On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> On 14 Jun 2015 10:01, "Ben Leslie" <benno at benno.id.au> wrote: >> > >> > If this seems like a good approach I'll try and work it in to a >> > suitable patch for contribution. >> >> I think it's a good approach, and worth opening an enhancement issue for. >> >> I expect any patch would need some adjustments after Yury has finished >> revising the async/await implementation to address some beta compatibility >> issues with functools.singledispatch and Tornado. >> >> Cheers, >> Nick. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Python-Dev mailing list >> Python-Dev at python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev >> Unsubscribe: >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org >> > > > > -- > --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4