A good plan. I think this could be added to 3.5 still? It's a pretty minor adjustment to the PEP 492 machinery, really. On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 14 Jun 2015 10:01, "Ben Leslie" <benno at benno.id.au> wrote: > > > > If this seems like a good approach I'll try and work it in to a > > suitable patch for contribution. > > I think it's a good approach, and worth opening an enhancement issue for. > > I expect any patch would need some adjustments after Yury has finished > revising the async/await implementation to address some beta compatibility > issues with functools.singledispatch and Tornado. > > Cheers, > Nick. > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org > > -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150614/feced550/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4