On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: [...] > I think we have been laxist with additions to the stable ABI: > apparently, they should be conditioned on the API version requested by > the user. For example, in pystate.h: > > #if !defined(Py_LIMITED_API) || Py_LIMITED_API+0 >= 0x03030000 > /* New in 3.3 */ > PyAPI_FUNC(int) PyState_AddModule(PyObject*, struct PyModuleDef*); > PyAPI_FUNC(int) PyState_RemoveModule(struct PyModuleDef*); > #endif > > (those were added by Martin, so I assume he knew what he was doing :-)) > > This way, failing to restrict yourself to a given API version fails at > compile time, not at runtime. However, it's also more work to do so > when adding stuff, which is why we tend to skimp on it. I see! I completely missed that memo. I filed a patch that wraps my 3.5 additions as issue 24365. I think this should be in the PEP, so people like me can find it. Does the attached wording look good? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: pep384.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 860 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150602/a6360209/attachment.bin>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4