A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-July/141046.html below:

[Python-Dev] Status on PEP-431 Timezones

[Python-Dev] Status on PEP-431 Timezones [Python-Dev] Status on PEP-431 TimezonesLennart Regebro regebro at gmail.com
Tue Jul 28 09:11:05 CEST 2015
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 9:00 AM, Tim Peters <tim.peters at gmail.com> wrote:
> [Lennart Regebro]
>> If you don't have to deal with DST, then you don't have to have
>> tzinfo's in your date objects.
>
> There are no tzinfos on date objects.  I assume Ronald is talking
> about datetime objects.

Of course, I meant datetime objects.
In everything else, I stand by my original claim. If you want naive
datetime obejcts, you should use naive datetime objects.
My opinion is and remains that intentionally breaking datetime
arithmetic to make non-naive objects behave in a naive way was a
mistake.

//Lennart
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4