On 7/27/2015 1:42 PM, Lennart Regebro wrote: > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Ethan Furman <ethan at stoneleaf.us> wrote: >> On 07/27/2015 07:46 AM, Lennart Regebro wrote: >>> Well, OK, let's propose these wordings: It looks like a date >>> operation, ie, add one to the date, but in reality it's a time >>> operation, ie add 86400 seconds to the time. These things sound >>> similar but are very different. >> I have to disagree. If I have my alarm at 7am (localtime ;) so I can be at >> work at 8am I don't care exactly how many seconds have passed, that alarm >> better go off at 7am local time. > Right. And then adding 86400 seconds to it is not the right thing to do. It is the right thing to do... but one also adds/subtracts 3600 seconds from it before going to bed 2 days a year, due to government interference, unless it is an atomic clock or cell-phone, which do those updates automatically. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150727/878a1774/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4