On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Ethan Furman <ethan at stoneleaf.us> wrote: > On 07/27/2015 07:46 AM, Lennart Regebro wrote: >> Well, OK, let's propose these wordings: It looks like a date >> operation, ie, add one to the date, but in reality it's a time >> operation, ie add 86400 seconds to the time. These things sound >> similar but are very different. > > I have to disagree. If I have my alarm at 7am (localtime ;) so I can be at > work at 8am I don't care exactly how many seconds have passed, that alarm > better go off at 7am local time. Right. And then adding 86400 seconds to it is not the right thing to do. //Lennart
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4