On 07/27/2015 07:46 AM, Lennart Regebro wrote: > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: >> >> To me, Paul's example is a datetime operation: you start with a datetime >> (7am today), perform arithmetic on it by adding a period of time (one >> day), and get a datetime as the result (7am tomorrow). > > Well, OK, let's propose these wordings: It looks like a date > operation, ie, add one to the date, but in reality it's a time > operation, ie add 86400 seconds to the time. These things sound > similar but are very different. I have to disagree. If I have my alarm at 7am (localtime ;) so I can be at work at 8am I don't care exactly how many seconds have passed, that alarm better go off at 7am local time. -- ~Ethan~
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4