On Monday, July 20, 2015, Emile van Sebille <emile at fenx.com> wrote: > Your +infinity could have easily been top posted -- particularly when > there's no in-line comments that require context. > > just-because-I'm-on-what-feels-like-a-300-baud-connection-ly yr's, > > Emile > > > On 7/19/2015 2:16 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote: > >> On 19/07/2015 22:06, Brett Cannon wrote: >> > > <snip> > > There is absolutely no reason we can't keep discussions cordial, >>> friendly, and on-point on this list and prevent this sort of debacle >>> from occurring again. >>> >>> >> +infinity >> > Empty replies like a fake vote should just not occur in general. That's not usually an issue on this list, but I see many others plagued by such responses and hope we never end up on that path (especially people +1'ing a +1...). Remember that not only do we need to keep emails to the characteristics Brett mentioned for the sake of having a healthy discussion list, we should strive to keep the noise as close to zero as possible as mails sent to this list reach *a lot* of people. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150720/12a8fa43/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4