On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 4:31 AM, Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote: > I think this line in the PEP, "Because of this policy, no further Windows > releases need to be listed in this PEP. " is false economy. Your research on > server 2003 should be recorded. (The presence of a 3.5 Server 2003 buildbot, > even though not working, might lead one to the opposite answer.) Even if > users ignore the PEP, people answering questions (like me) try to use it to > get definitive answers. Also, if it comes to that, Server 2003 should probably get mentioned here, which is where I'd go looking: https://docs.python.org/dev/whatsnew/3.5.html#unsupported-operating-systems ChrisA
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4