RetroSearch Browse

Sun Jul 19 22:33:32 CEST 2015 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-July/140825.html

On 07/19/2015 11:11 AM, Terry Reedy wrote:

> Given that the issue is one of only partial reversion, and that a new patch would
> therefore be needed, I also think that some fuss would have been avoided if one of
> the initial objectors had done what you did, or volunteered to write a new patch,
>  or had at least acknowledged that someone other than Michael could and should write
>  the proposed new patch.

I was waiting for somebody to say "Patches welcome" -- so far every patch I have submitted (or reviewed and enhanced) for other parts of Python have been rejected (and I fully expect this one to be as 
well :(  -- I'm just waiting for Raymond to chime in and give it the coup de grâce).

--
~Ethan~

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-July/140825.html below:

[Python-Dev] How far to go with user-friendliness