On 07/18/2015 05:13 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > However, from the core developer side [...] Participants Core Dev? Position on "assret" ---------------------- ----------- -------------------- Dima Tismek no -1 Xavier Morel no -1 Florian Bruhin no ? Mark Lawrence no ? Stephen J. Turnbull no -.5 (?) Alexander no -1 David Mertz no -1 Ron Adam no ? Christie Wilson no +1 (?) Ben Finney no -1 Isaac Schwabacher no -1 MRAB ?* -0 (?) Michael Foord yes +1 Antoine Pitrou yes +1 Victor Stinner yes +1 (?) Nick Coghlan yes +1 Paul Moore yes +0 A.M. Kuchling yes -0 Robert Collins yes -1 Brett Canon yes -.5 (?) Berker Peksağ yes -.5 (?) Steven D'Aprano yes -1 Barry Warsaw yes -.5 (?) Ethan Furman yes -1 Looks like this thread was pretty evenly split between core devs and non-core devs. Looks like a definite majority of non-core devs, and at least a slight majority of core devs, think "assret" should be removed. Apparently you do not speak for all core devs on this issue, so please don't pretend that you do. Oh, and just a small tidbit of info -- it took longer to research and write this email than it did to write the patch to remove "assret" checking [1]. Seems to me a lot of fuss could have been avoided by just acknowledging that a mistake may have been made, and asking for patches if anybody cared enough about it. -- ~Ethan~ [1] http://bugs.python.org/issue24656
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4