s.krah writes:
> Sorry, that amounts to twisting my words.
Let's not play the dozens here. That just extends the thread to no
point.
> It would be a great loss if he really stops and I hope he'll
> reconsider.
I agree with both points. I don't think anybody disagrees, so let's
not belabor them, either -- after all, the point here is that people
keep posting about things that don't help solve real problems.
I have two proposals on the table ("cloture" and "redirect people
dissatisfied with the offered rationale to a more appropriate channel
for discussion"). Perhaps we could discuss those, or propose
additional or better ways to improve the situation, or a better
channel for this "meta" discussion itself? After Nick's post, I think
there's no denying that Antoine has plenty of company in frustration
-- there is a systematic problem here.
Regards,
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4