On 17 July 2015 at 09:35, Alexander <xr.lists at gmail.com> wrote: >> By the way, I've also been bitten by this several times, so I >> appreciate the desire to at least warn users (or raise an exception, or >> whatever). > > It is not an intention to make tests more robust. It is the > implementation, which is questionable at least. I actually still hope > that the whole thing is a joke. > > I do not want to read mistyped code from other developers and try to > guess whether it will work properly or not. *Any* operation starting with "assret_*" on a Mock object will throw AttributeError in 3.5+. The only way to get it to *work* is to spell it properly. The specific typo that is checked is the only one that changes the spelling without also changing the overall length and shape of the word. Regards, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4