A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-July/140755.html below:

[Python-Dev] How far to go with user-friendliness

[Python-Dev] How far to go with user-friendliness [Python-Dev] How far to go with user-friendlinessMark Lawrence breamoreboy at yahoo.co.uk
Wed Jul 15 01:07:44 CEST 2015
On 14/07/2015 23:22, Robert Collins wrote:
>
> For clarity, I think we should:
>   - remove the assret check, it is I think spurious.
>   - add a set of functions to the mock module that should be used in
> preference to Mock.assert*
>   - mark the Mock.assert* functions as PendingDeprecation
>   - in 3.6 move the PendingDeprecation to Deprecated
>   - in 3.7 remove the Mock.assert* functions and the check for method
> names beginning with assert entirely.
>
> -Rob

+1 from me as not even Baldrick could do better, see 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baldrick :)

-- 
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.

Mark Lawrence

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4