On 14 July 2015 at 14:25, R. David Murray <rdmurray at bitdance.com> wrote: > On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 14:01:25 +1200, Robert Collins <robertc at robertcollins.net> wrote: >> So unittest.mock regressed during 3.5, and I found out when I released >> the mock backport. >> >> The regression is pretty shallow - I've applied the fix to 3.6, its a >> one-liner and comes with a patch. >> >> Whats the process for getting this into 3.5? Its likely to affect a >> lot of folk using mock (pretty much every OpenStack project got git >> with it when I released mock 1.1). > > 3.5 hasn't been released yet. The patch ideally would have gone into > 3.5 first, then been merged to 3.6. As it is, you'll apply it to > 3.5, and then do a null merge to 3.6. It will get released in the > next 3.5 beta. What I'm unclear on is the approval process for doing ^. -Rob -- Robert Collins <rbtcollins at hp.com> Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4